Blake Thomas Segoria DPE Checkride Gouges
Designated Pilot Examiner
Preparing for an FAA checkride with Designated Pilot Examiner (DPE) Blake Thomas Segoria? GougeHub has a first-hand Blake Thomas Segoria checkride gouge report from a pilot who tested in Washington. Read oral exam questions, flight test patterns, and examiner insights.
↓ View 1 available gouge reportOral Emphasis
The oral exam is heavily weighted toward Fundamentals of Instruction (FOI). Expect to spend significant time on learning theory, teaching methods, and how you'd apply FOI concepts in real instructional scenarios. Endorsements are another major focus area — pilots reported needing to know specific endorsement requirements thoroughly, not just have a general familiarity.
Common Questions
- Scenario-based questions that test how you'd handle real-world teaching situations, rather than straightforward rote recall.
- A runway incursion teaching scenario was presented — be ready to explain how you would teach a student to recognize and avoid runway incursions.
- Endorsement-related questions that require you to know the specific requirements, applicability, and proper documentation — not just reference where to find them.
Examiner Style
Segoria appears to favor a scenario-driven approach over simple Q&A. He'll put you in the instructor's seat and ask how you'd teach or handle specific situations. This means you need to think like a CFI, not just recite answers. The scenarios can feel tricky if you haven't practiced applying FOI concepts to realistic teaching situations.
What Surprised Pilots
- The depth of the FOI questioning — this wasn't a surface-level review. Pilots noted it was a heavier FOI focus than they expected.
- The runway incursion teaching scenario caught at least one applicant off guard. It's not a topic every CFI applicant drills on, but Segoria clearly thinks it's important instructional material.
Examiner Patterns
Preliminary insight — based on 1 report
- Oral style: 1 pilot reported the examiner used scenario-based questioning throughout
- Logbook review: 1 pilot reported the examiner reviewed endorsements specifically
- Density altitude: 1 pilot reported the examiner did not cover density altitude
- Go/no-go discussion: 1 pilot reported the examiner did not cover go/no-go
- Equipment failure simulated: 1 pilot reported the examiner did not simulate an equipment failure
Based on self-reported pilot submissions. Data methodology
Ratings & Checkride Types
- CFI (Certified Flight Instructor)
FAA Designee Information
FAA Oversight Office: Portland FSDO
Status: Active Designee
- Private Pilot Examiner: Airplane Single Engine Land, Airplane Multi-Engine Land
- Commercial & Instrument Rating Examiner: Airplane Multi-Engine Land, Airplane Single Engine Land
- Flight Instructor Examiner: Airplane Single Engine, Airplane Multi-Engine
- Flight Instructor Examiner — Instrument: Airplane Single Engine, Airplane Multi-Engine
- Ground Instructor Examiner
- Flight Instructor Rating Examiner
Source: FAA Designee Management System · Verify on FAA.gov →
Transparency Disclaimer: This page summarizes patterns reported by applicants. It is not an endorsement, prediction, or guarantee of checkride outcome. Every checkride varies based on the applicant and circumstances.