Dave Burton DPE Checkride Gouges
Designated Pilot Examiner • (David Nelson Burton)
Preparing for an FAA checkride with Designated Pilot Examiner (DPE) Dave Burton? GougeHub has a first-hand Dave Burton checkride gouge report from a pilot who tested in Hammonton. Read oral exam questions, flight test patterns, and examiner insights.
↓ View 1 available gouge reportOral Emphasis
Reports indicate Dave covers a broad range of oral topics you'd expect for the private pilot checkride. Pilots noted he digs into specifics rather than staying surface-level, though the gouge doesn't call out a single dominant topic area. Be prepared to discuss the full spread of PPL knowledge areas with enough depth to show real understanding.
Practical Focus
The flight portion is where Dave's checkride really stands out for its thoroughness. Pilots reported a full sequence that includes:
- A diversion scenario — be ready to plan and execute a reroute on the fly.
- An engine-out procedure taken all the way to an actual landing, not just a simulated go-around. Know your emergency procedures cold and be comfortable committing to a field.
- Multiple ground-reference and field maneuvers — expect more than one or two; he wants to see a range of skills.
The flight covers a lot of ground in one session, so staying organized and managing your workload throughout is important.
Examiner Style
Based on the gouge, Dave comes across as a straightforward examiner who keeps things moving. The checkride flows from oral to flight in a structured sequence, and he appears to let pilots work through scenarios rather than interrupting constantly. There's nothing in the reports suggesting he's adversarial, but he clearly expects solid performance across the board — the breadth of tasks in the flight portion alone signals he's thorough.
What Surprised Pilots
- The engine-out scenario going all the way to an actual landing caught attention — some pilots may expect a simulated approach only, so be mentally prepared to commit to the field.
- The number of maneuvers packed into the flight was notable. Don't assume you'll only see a handful of items — Dave covers a full spread.
Examiner Patterns
Preliminary insight — based on 1 report
- Weight & Balance: 1 pilot reported the examiner asked applicants to walk through W&B verbally
- Oral style: 1 pilot reported the examiner kept the oral conversational
- Navigation tools: 1 pilot reported the examiner accepted ForeFlight for weather only
- Density altitude: 1 pilot reported the examiner did not cover density altitude
- Go/no-go discussion: 1 pilot reported the examiner asked a standalone go/no-go question
- Equipment failure simulated: 1 pilot reported the examiner simulated an engine failure
- Preflight briefing: 1 pilot reported the examiner gave a brief overview before flight
- When ACS standard not met: 1 pilot reported the examiner (no ACS standard was exceeded in these reports)
Based on self-reported pilot submissions. Data methodology
Ratings & Checkride Types
- PPL (Private Pilot)
FAA Designee Information
FAA Oversight Office: Philadelphia FSDO
Status: Active Designee
- Private Pilot Examiner: Airplane Single Engine Land, Airplane Multi-Engine Land
- Commercial & Instrument Rating Examiner: Airplane Single Engine Land, Airplane Multi-Engine Land
- Flight Instructor Examiner: Airplane Single Engine
- Military Competency Examiner
- Ground Instructor Examiner
- Flight Instructor Rating Examiner
Source: FAA Designee Management System · Verify on FAA.gov →
Transparency Disclaimer: This page summarizes patterns reported by applicants. It is not an endorsement, prediction, or guarantee of checkride outcome. Every checkride varies based on the applicant and circumstances.