James Duvall DPE Checkride Gouges
Designated Pilot Examiner • (James Duvall III)
Preparing for an FAA checkride with Designated Pilot Examiner (DPE) James Duvall? GougeHub has 4 first-hand James Duvall checkride gouge reports from pilots who tested. Review oral exam questions, flight test patterns, and examiner insights for CFI, CFII, and CPL checkrides.
↓ View 4 available gouge reportsFour reports are on file for James Duvall, covering the CFII, commercial, and CFI checkrides. The picture they paint stays consistent. He wants conceptual understanding, not memorized procedure. One CFII applicant noted that he won't dig deeper once you show you know your material. So study to understand, and you save yourself trouble.
On the commercial side, one applicant described a rushed checkride with specific oral questions. He asked about landing scenarios and walked through maneuver sequences. Know the order of your maneuvers and what each one demands. The pace moved fast, so come ready to answer without long pauses.
The CFI ride asks for different answers than the commercial ride. One report stressed that he demands instructional knowledge, not commercial responses. He set specific pattern altitude targets and threw a notorious NOTAMs question that catches people off guard. Review NOTAMs sources and how you would teach them before you walk in.
Another CFI report describes his real personality. He's methodical and story-driven, and he cares about clear teaching over perfection. He values practical judgment and solid lesson structure. Repeat sticking points include coordination in maneuvers and knowing your fundamentals cold. Build a clean lesson plan and be ready to teach the basics with confidence.
So how do you prepare for Duvall? Understand the concepts behind every task, then practice teaching them in plain terms. Match your answers to the certificate you're chasing, since CFI and commercial expectations differ. Fly coordinated, hold your pattern altitudes, and have your NOTAMs knowledge ready. He rewards clear thinking and honest judgment over a flawless show.
Examiner Patterns
Early reports (4) suggest
- Weight & Balance: 2 of 3 applicants report the examiner required a full W&B calculation
- Oral style: 2 of 4 applicants report the examiner kept the oral conversational
- Oral duration: Most common — 1 to 1.5 hours (1 of 3 reports)
- Navigation tools: 1 of 2 applicants report the examiner required paper charts
- Logbook review: 1 of 2 applicants report the examiner took a quick glance at the logbook
- Density altitude: 3 of 4 applicants report the examiner did not cover density altitude
- Go/no-go discussion: 2 of 4 applicants report the examiner did not cover go/no-go
- Equipment failure simulated: 2 of 4 applicants report the examiner simulated an electrical failure
- Preflight briefing: 2 of 3 applicants report the examiner gave a brief overview before flight
- When ACS standard not met: 2 of 2 applicants report the examiner (no ACS standard was exceeded in these reports)
Based on self-reported pilot submissions. Data methodology
Ratings & Checkride Types
- CFI (Certified Flight Instructor)
- CFII (Instrument Flight Instructor)
- CPL (Commercial Pilot)
FAA Designee Information
FAA Oversight Office: Reno FSDO
Status: Active Designee
- Private Pilot Examiner: Airplane Single Engine Land, Airplane Multi-Engine Land, Airplane Single Engine Sea
- Commercial & Instrument Rating Examiner: Airplane Single Engine Land, Airplane Multi-Engine Land, Airplane Single Engine Sea
- ATPE: Airplane Multi-Engine Land
- Flight Instructor Examiner: Airplane Single Engine, Airplane Multi-Engine
- Flight Instructor Examiner — Instrument: Airplane Single Engine, Airplane Multi-Engine
- Flight Instructor Rating Examiner
- Balloon Airman Examiner
Source: FAA Designee Management System · Verify on FAA.gov →
Other DPEs in Maryland
Transparency Disclaimer: This page summarizes patterns reported by applicants. It is not an endorsement, prediction, or guarantee of checkride outcome. Every checkride varies based on the applicant and circumstances.