Jay Lawrence DPE Checkride Gouges
Designated Pilot Examiner • (Jack Caldwell Lawrence) • Location coming soon
↓ View 2 available gouge reportsOral Emphasis
Jay's oral is heavily weighted toward regulations, airworthiness, and pilot currency/proficiency. Pilots consistently reported deep dives into the following areas:
- Airworthiness & Maintenance: ARROW documents, annual/100-hour inspections, airworthiness directives (types), when a 100-hour is required vs. not, and proving the airplane is airworthy using logbooks.
- Regulations & Privileges: Flight review (biannual) requirements, whether the checkride counts, medical certificate expiration, BasicMed limitations (including recent regulatory changes), and the process for placarding inoperative equipment under 91.213(d).
- Commercial Privileges (CPL): "Holding out" definition with scenario-based examples, such as whether a Facebook ad for pilot services is legal.
- Weight & Balance: Scenario-based — e.g., how removing wheel pants changes the W&B data and what you need to adjust.
- Weather: Types of icing (clear, mixed, rime), how they form. Aeromedical factors including IMSAFE and carbon monoxide poisoning symptoms — make sure you mention headache specifically.
- Airspace & Charts: Identifying airspace types from the sectional (including remote towered airports like KFNL), what's above it, special use airspace using the MCPRAWN mnemonic, and chart symbology for nearby airports (e.g., parachute jumping areas).
- Equipment & Systems: 91.205 required equipment, high-performance endorsement requirements — he may ask if you can fly a specific aircraft model and expect you to work through the endorsement logic.
Common Questions
Jay favors scenario-driven questions rather than pure rote recall. Pilots reported question styles like:
- Presenting a real-world situation (e.g., a rotating beacon is inoperative — what are your options?) and expecting you to walk through the regulatory path, citing specific FARs.
- Asking about a specific aircraft (e.g., Cirrus SR22) and expecting you to determine what endorsements or ratings you'd need based on its specs.
- Giving advertising or compensation scenarios and asking you to determine legality under commercial regulations.
- Asking follow-up "why" questions — he doesn't just want the answer, he wants you to show the regulation or logic behind it.
Practical Focus
Flight portions reported were thorough. Key observations:
- The private pilot flight was 2.4 hours — expect a full-length evaluation, not a quick pass.
- Simulated engine failures are a key item. Jay will pull your engine and observe your full restart flow and decision-making process. He will not volunteer whether the engine has restarted — you need to work through the checklist, make your own calls, and commit to a landing decision if needed.
- He actively looks for your weaknesses during the flight and will test them further once identified.
- He wants to see that you can recognize and correct your own mistakes in real time.
Examiner Style
- Very straightforward and methodical. He works directly from the ACS, checking off each item as you satisfy it — he calls this his "plan of action."
- He is not overly chatty or warm, but he is fair. Pilots described him as direct and businesslike.
- He can be intentionally quiet during critical phases — especially simulated emergencies — to see how you handle uncertainty and make command decisions on your own.
- Multiple pilots noted he can be lacking in communication at times, particularly when you're looking for feedback mid-maneuver. Don't expect hand-holding; he wants to see a pilot in command.
- He responded positively to organized candidates. Bringing a prepared binder with pre-drawn systems diagrams and FAA references was noted favorably.
What Surprised Pilots
- His silence during the simulated engine failure caught pilots off guard — when asked directly whether the engine restarted, he deflected with comments like asking what the captain is going to do. Be prepared to make autonomous decisions without his confirmation.
- He asked about a "remote towered airport" designation (KFNL), which he acknowledged was a newer concept. Be ready for current or recently changed topics.
- He brought up the recent BasicMed rule change (updated roughly 3 months prior to the checkride) — he expects you to know current regulations, not just what was in your study materials months ago.
- Pilots recommended discussing flight expectations with him during the break between oral and flight — he was receptive to clarifying things like exchange of flight controls procedures and what he wanted to physically see you do in the cockpit.
Examiner Patterns
Early reports (2) suggest
- Oral style: 2 of 2 applicants report the examiner kept the oral conversational
- Logbook review: 1 of 2 applicants report the examiner took a quick glance at the logbook
- Density altitude: 2 of 2 applicants report the examiner did not cover density altitude
- Go/no-go discussion: 2 of 2 applicants report the examiner did not cover go/no-go
- Equipment failure simulated: 2 of 2 applicants report the examiner simulated another type of equipment failure
- Preflight briefing: 1 of 2 applicants report the examiner gave no preflight briefing
- When ACS standard not met: 1 of 2 applicants report the examiner (no ACS standard was exceeded in these reports)
Based on self-reported pilot submissions. Data methodology
Ratings & Checkride Types
- CPL (Commercial Pilot)
- PPL (Private Pilot)
Transparency Disclaimer: This page summarizes patterns reported by applicants. It is not an endorsement, prediction, or guarantee of checkride outcome. Every checkride varies based on the applicant and circumstances.