Jeremy Mark Auslander DPE Checkride Gouges
Designated Pilot Examiner
Preparing for an FAA checkride with Designated Pilot Examiner (DPE) Jeremy Mark Auslander? GougeHub has a first-hand Jeremy Mark Auslander checkride gouge report from a pilot who tested. Read oral exam questions, flight test patterns, and examiner insights.
↓ View 1 available gouge reportAs of this writing, one CFI report is on file for Jeremy Mark Auslander. The applicant described the checkride as thorough and methodical. Auslander comes across as fair and focused on the big picture of flying. He wants to see that you can teach, not just talk.
The oral covered practical flight maneuver details and the reasoning behind them. The report points to an examiner philosophy that values why a maneuver works, not memorized steps. Auslander connects each topic back to how you would explain it to a student. So plan to teach out loud and back your answers with sound logic.
The flight portion centered on practical maneuver work. The applicant noted real detail in how those maneuvers were flown and evaluated. Auslander stays focused on overall airmanship rather than picking apart small errors. He looks for control of the aircraft and clear instruction throughout.
The overall tone from the one report is fair and methodical. Auslander does not try to trap you or rush the process. He works through tasks in an orderly way and keeps the standard clear. The applicant left feeling the checkride matched the way a CFI should think and fly.
This profile rests on a single account, so treat it as a starting point. If you fly with Auslander soon, prepare to teach your maneuvers and explain your reasoning. Show big-picture judgment and steady aircraft control. Then add your own report so the next CFI applicant has more to go on.
Examiner Patterns
Preliminary insight — based on 1 report
- Oral style: 1 pilot reported the examiner kept the oral conversational
- Oral duration: 1 pilot reported — 1 to 1.5 hours
- Flight duration: 1 pilot reported — 1 to 1.5 hours
- Logbook review: 1 pilot reported the examiner reviewed endorsements specifically
- Density altitude: 1 pilot reported the examiner did not cover density altitude
- Go/no-go discussion: 1 pilot reported the examiner asked a standalone go/no-go question
- Equipment failure simulated: 1 pilot reported the examiner did not simulate an equipment failure
- Preflight briefing: 1 pilot reported the examiner gave a brief overview before flight
- When ACS standard not met: 1 pilot reported the examiner noted the deviation and continued
Based on self-reported pilot submissions. Data methodology
Ratings & Checkride Types
- CFI (Certified Flight Instructor)
FAA Designee Information
FAA Oversight Office: Teterboro FSDO
Status: Active Designee
- Private Pilot Examiner: Airplane Single Engine Land, Airplane Single Engine Sea, Airplane Multi-Engine Land
- Sport Pilot Examiner: Airplane Single Engine Sea, Airplane Single Engine Land
- Flight Instructor Examiner — Instrument: Airplane Single Engine, Airplane Multi-Engine
- Flight Instructor Examiner: Airplane Single Engine, Airplane Multi-Engine
- Commercial & Instrument Rating Examiner: Airplane Single Engine Sea, Airplane Single Engine Land, Airplane Multi-Engine Land
- ATPE: Airplane Single Engine Sea, Airplane Single Engine Land, Airplane Multi-Engine Land
- Balloon Airman Examiner
- Military Competency Examiner
- Ground Instructor Examiner
- Flight Proficiency Examiner
- Flight Instructor Rating Examiner
Source: FAA Designee Management System · Verify on FAA.gov →
Transparency Disclaimer: This page summarizes patterns reported by applicants. It is not an endorsement, prediction, or guarantee of checkride outcome. Every checkride varies based on the applicant and circumstances.