Ken Cobb DPE Checkride Gouges
Designated Pilot Examiner • (Kenneth Sebastian Cobb)
Preparing for an FAA checkride with Designated Pilot Examiner (DPE) Ken Cobb? GougeHub has a first-hand Ken Cobb checkride gouge report from a pilot who tested in Tennessee. Read oral exam questions, flight test patterns, and examiner insights.
↓ View 1 available gouge reportOral Emphasis
Ken builds the oral around a practical cross-country scenario he assigns about a week before the checkride. For the multi-engine ride, pilots reported being asked to plan a multi-leg trip with alternates for each leg, fuel planning that accounts for flying approaches at both the destination and alternate airports, and familiarity with TEC routes. He also checks logbook entries carefully — complex and high-performance endorsements were specifically verified for the Seneca.
- Cross-country planning with multi-leg scenario and alternates
- Fuel planning including approach fuel burn at destination and alternate
- TEC route familiarity and how flight planning tools (e.g., ForeFlight) display routing
- Logbook and endorsement verification — he uses a checklist
Common Questions
Ken's questioning style is conversational and scenario-driven rather than rote quiz-style. Pilots reported that he focused on practical decision-making within the cross-country scenario, such as how you'd choose an alternate starting from the missed approach point and how you computed fuel reserves for each leg. He was interested in how pilots used electronic flight planning tools and whether they understood the underlying logic.
Examiner Style
Pilots consistently describe Ken as personable and easy to talk to — more like chatting with a friend than being grilled by an examiner. He tends to show up about 20 minutes late, so plan accordingly. He goes through the required paperwork using a structured checklist but keeps things moving, especially if he's seen you before. He covers the pilot's bill of rights and required administrative items efficiently.
- Conversational, relaxed demeanor — puts you at ease
- Expect him to arrive ~20 minutes after the scheduled start time
- Uses a qualification checklist for pilot and aircraft documents
- Scenario-based oral rather than rapid-fire questions
What Surprised Pilots
- The level of detail expected in pre-checkride planning — alternates from the missed approach point and full fuel plans for each leg go beyond what regulations strictly require, but Ken values this real-world thoroughness.
- He assigns the cross-country scenario about a week in advance via phone call, so be ready for that conversation and treat it as the start of your checkride prep.
- Despite the thorough preparation requirements, the overall atmosphere was described as the best checkride experience compared to other examiners in the area.
Examiner Patterns
Preliminary insight — based on 1 report
- Oral style: 1 pilot reported the examiner kept the oral conversational
- Navigation tools: 1 pilot reported the examiner accepted ForeFlight for weather only
- Logbook review: 1 pilot reported the examiner reviewed endorsements specifically
- Density altitude: 1 pilot reported the examiner did not cover density altitude
- Go/no-go discussion: 1 pilot reported the examiner did not cover go/no-go
- Equipment failure simulated: 1 pilot reported the examiner simulated an engine failure
- Preflight briefing: 1 pilot reported the examiner gave a brief overview before flight
Based on self-reported pilot submissions. Data methodology
Ratings & Checkride Types
- CMEL (Commercial Multi-Engine)
FAA Designee Information
FAA Oversight Office: Fresno FSDO
Status: Active Designee
- Private Pilot Examiner: Airplane Multi-Engine Land, Airplane Single Engine Land
- Commercial & Instrument Rating Examiner: Airplane Single Engine Land, Airplane Multi-Engine Land
- Ground Instructor Examiner
- Military Competency Examiner
- Flight Instructor Rating Examiner
Source: FAA Designee Management System · Verify on FAA.gov →
Transparency Disclaimer: This page summarizes patterns reported by applicants. It is not an endorsement, prediction, or guarantee of checkride outcome. Every checkride varies based on the applicant and circumstances.