Mike Healey DPE Checkride Gouges
Designated Pilot Examiner • (MICHAEL HEALEY) • Location coming soon
↓ View 1 available gouge reportOral Emphasis
Mike's oral is heavily scenario-driven and built around the cross-country flight plan you're given. Expect deep discussion on:
- Real-world decision-making: He'll layer complications into your scenario — weather, weight and balance issues, airspace restrictions — and wants to hear you reason through them as PIC.
- Weight and balance: Be ready to discover that your planned flight may not be legal as loaded. Know how to identify the problem and propose a solution.
- Weather and VFR minimums: He may introduce TFRs, wildfires, or reduced visibility into your scenario. You need to recognize when a leg is no-go and articulate why.
- Aircraft systems failures: Alternator failure, engine failure, electrical failure — he wants to hear your course of action and, critically, the reasoning behind each step.
- Required documents: He starts by reviewing all your pilot and aircraft documents, so have your student pilot certificate, medical, logbook with endorsements, written exam results, and aircraft paperwork organized and ready.
Common Questions
Pilots reported that Mike doesn't ask isolated trivia-style questions. Instead, his questions grow organically out of the scenario. Typical question styles include:
- "What would you do if [system failure] happened, and why?"
- Asking you to evaluate whether a planned flight is even possible given the scenario's weather and weight constraints.
- Presenting a problem and expecting you to propose a practical alternative plan — not just identify the issue, but solve it like a real pilot would.
Practical Focus
The flight portion is thorough — reported at around 1.8 hours. While specific maneuver details were limited in this gouge, the length of the flight suggests comprehensive coverage of the PTS/ACS standards. Pilots should be prepared for a full-length evaluation with no shortcuts.
Examiner Style
Mike is widely described as fair and genuinely wanting applicants to succeed. Key style notes:
- Conversational, not adversarial: The oral feels more like a discussion than an interrogation. He's looking for reasoning, not rote memorization.
- Redirects rather than fails: If you're heading off track during the oral, he'll try to guide you back toward the right answer rather than immediately marking it wrong. He gives you a chance to get there.
- Expects PIC authority: He wants you to own your decisions. Don't be wishy-washy — state what you'd do and back it up.
What Surprised Pilots
- The scenario-based approach caught some pilots off guard — the oral isn't a checklist of random questions. It's built around your specific cross-country plan with realistic complications layered in.
- Pilots were surprised to find that the "right" answer to parts of the scenario was that the flight shouldn't happen as planned. Be ready to no-go a leg and propose a creative but safe alternative.
- Despite pre-checkride nerves, pilots reported feeling more at ease once the oral got going because of Mike's approachable demeanor and willingness to help applicants demonstrate their knowledge.
Ratings & Checkride Types
- PPL (Private Pilot)
Transparency Disclaimer: This page summarizes patterns reported by applicants. It is not an endorsement, prediction, or guarantee of checkride outcome. Every checkride varies based on the applicant and circumstances.