Thomas Tam DPE Checkride Gouges
Designated Pilot Examiner
Preparing for an FAA checkride with Designated Pilot Examiner (DPE) Thomas Tam? GougeHub has a first-hand Thomas Tam checkride gouge report from a pilot who tested. Read oral exam questions, flight test patterns, and examiner insights.
↓ View 1 available gouge reportOral Emphasis
The oral portion is reported as short — around 30 minutes for a commercial multi-engine ride. Tam focuses on multi-engine-specific systems and procedures rather than broad knowledge quizzing.
- Weight and balance (brief)
- Fuel system overview
- Engine and propeller systems
- Landing gear system — this gets the most attention. Be ready to discuss gear indicator failures, what steps you'd take (checklist, requesting a tower flyby, pulling Gs to help the gear lock).
- Performance: PAST (Power, Altitude, Speed, Trim) and SMACFUM in detail
Common Questions
- What would you do if you had a landing gear indicator failure? Walk through your troubleshooting steps.
- Explain SMACFUM and be ready to discuss each element in depth.
- Be prepared to briefly discuss W&B, fuel planning, and prop/engine system basics — he touches on these but doesn't dwell.
Practical Focus
- The flight portion is fast-paced. Expect to begin maneuvers almost immediately after departing the Delta airspace — there's little transition time.
- Vmc demo: He may assist by inputting rudder to accelerate reaching the demonstration point. Know the maneuver cold.
- Single-engine approaches and patterns are part of the ride.
- He handled approach communications himself and vectored the aircraft onto final, so be ready for him to take over radios.
- Flight time reported around 1.4 hours.
Examiner Style
This is where pilot opinions diverge sharply. Everyone agrees on one thing: Tam prioritizes efficiency and wants to get through the checkride quickly.
- Casual demeanor — reported showing up in jeans and a T-shirt, using colorful language in the cockpit.
- Some pilots found him fair and straightforward, describing the experience as no-nonsense and efficient.
- Others found him rude and unprofessional, feeling rushed and sensing he didn't want to be there. One pilot reported Tam becoming visibly annoyed when they wanted to conduct a preflight inspection.
- He schedules checkrides on his terms — early morning slots (as early as 6 AM) have been reported.
- He is a Delta airline pilot, and multiple gouges reference this as context for his schedule-driven pace.
What Surprised Pilots
- The speed of the entire checkride — both oral and flight — caught pilots off guard. Don't mistake brevity for ease; be ready to perform from the moment you sit down.
- His willingness to take over radios and vector the aircraft himself during the flight portion was unexpected.
- The contrast between his casual appearance/language and the actual checkride standards surprised some pilots.
- Being visibly impatient with a standard preflight was a red flag for at least one applicant — don't let the pace pressure you into skipping your own safety procedures.
Examiner Patterns
Preliminary insight — based on 1 report
- Oral style: 1 pilot reported the examiner kept the oral conversational
- Oral duration: 1 pilot reported — under 1 hour
- Flight duration: 1 pilot reported — 1 to 1.5 hours
- Go/no-go discussion: 1 pilot reported the examiner briefly touched on go/no-go
- Equipment failure simulated: 1 pilot reported the examiner simulated another type of equipment failure
- Preflight briefing: 1 pilot reported the examiner gave no preflight briefing
Based on self-reported pilot submissions. Data methodology
Ratings & Checkride Types
- CMEL (Commercial Multi-Engine)
FAA Designee Information
FAA Oversight Office: Delegation And Resource Branch, Afg-970
Status: Active Designee
- Private Pilot Examiner: Airplane Single Engine Land, Airplane Multi-Engine Land
- Commercial & Instrument Rating Examiner: Airplane Single Engine Land, Airplane Multi-Engine Land
- ATPE: Airplane Single Engine Land, Airplane Multi-Engine Land
Source: FAA Designee Management System · Verify on FAA.gov →
Transparency Disclaimer: This page summarizes patterns reported by applicants. It is not an endorsement, prediction, or guarantee of checkride outcome. Every checkride varies based on the applicant and circumstances.