Orion Kingman DPE Checkride Gouges
Designated Pilot Examiner • Location coming soon
↓ View 3 available gouge reportsOral Emphasis
Orion builds the entire oral around your cross-country flight plan. Every topic — weather, airspace, regulations, weight and balance, fuel planning — gets discussed in the context of your planned route and scenario. Come ready to defend your go/no-go decision with real data.
- Pilot qualifications & currency: Privileges and limitations of your certificate, medical requirements, the difference between currency and proficiency, IMSAFE/PAVE checklists, personal minimums, and when your BFR clock starts.
- Airworthiness: Required inspections, airworthiness directives, MELs, how to handle inoperative equipment (e.g., can you fly with a tail light INOP?), and required documents (SPARROW / AAV1ATE or equivalent).
- Weather: Heavy emphasis. Expect to read and interpret METARs, TAFs, AIRMETs, SIGMETs, surface analysis charts, and winds aloft. He'll ask about thunderstorm stages and clearance distances, cloud coverage and VFR limits, temperature lapse rates, mountain wave turbulence, and lenticular clouds as go/no-go factors.
- Cross-country planning details: He'll dig into your NavLog — where calculations come from, true airspeed vs. ground speed, winds aloft, time between waypoints, and ForeFlight-specific abbreviations (DCT, H/T, ISA). Know your fuel plan and weight and balance cold.
- Airspace along your route: If your route goes through Class B, restricted areas, or other special-use airspace, know the equipment requirements, VFR weather minimums, communication protocols, and where to find active status information.
- IFR-specific (Instrument Rating): TEC routes, ODPs, SIDs (including specific departures at your planned airports), Diverse Vector Areas, alternate requirements, fuel reserves and holding endurance, and IFR chart symbology. He may ask you to identify random symbols on the low enroute chart along your route.
Common Questions
Orion's questions are practical and scenario-driven, not trick-based. Pilots consistently reported these styles:
- Asking you to walk through your NavLog and explain where each number comes from.
- Pointing at something on your route (airspace, terrain, weather) and asking you to "explain" it — requirements, risks, and your plan to deal with it.
- Posing "what would you do if" scenarios: flying into a cloud, encountering weather beyond your personal minimums, needing to hold longer than expected.
- Asking whether your certificate expires, whether you could fly a different aircraft type after passing, and when your flight review clock resets.
- For instrument candidates: asking why you chose a particular route or altitude and whether you considered alternatives (e.g., a lower-altitude T-Route over water vs. inland Victor Airways).
Practical Focus
Pilots reported the following about the flight portion:
- He may ask you to demonstrate a short field takeoff on departure.
- Expect to fly the first few legs of your cross-country, including requesting flight following and handling airspace transitions (one pilot received a Bravo clearance and climbed to 9,500 feet).
- During preflight, he largely stays hands-off but may ask targeted questions — one pilot was asked specifically what they were looking for when sumping fuel (color, debris, water), especially given recent weather conditions.
- Flight portions reported were substantial — one pilot logged 2.6 hours Hobbs.
Examiner Style
- Rapid-fire pacing: He keeps the oral moving briskly. He switches topics quickly and may circle back to a previous subject without warning.
- Wants concise answers: Don't over-explain. Give a direct answer and let him ask follow-up questions if he wants more.
- Strategic pauses: He may go silent after your answer to see if you'll second-guess yourself. Stick with your answer if you're confident.
- Helpful, not adversarial: If you're stuck, he'll guide you toward the answer to keep things moving rather than letting you flounder. No trick questions reported.
- Practical mindset: He wants to see that you think like a pilot making real decisions, not someone reciting textbook answers. Having a completed PAVE checklist, personal minimums, and tabbed FARs impressed him.
What Surprised Pilots
- The depth of ForeFlight NavLog questions — he expected pilots to explain specific abbreviations and where each calculation originated, not just have the document printed.
- Mountain wave turbulence and lenticular clouds came up as a go/no-go factor, which caught at least one pilot off guard.
- Temperature lapse rate questions (higher/lower than standard and what they mean for weather) were unexpectedly detailed for a PPL oral.
- For IFR candidates, he asked about IFR chart symbols that required checking the legend — including less common ones like brown airport symbols and VOR symbols without a compass rose.
- One pilot felt their oral performance was weak but still passed — reinforcing that Orion is looking for sound judgment and adequate knowledge, not perfection.
Examiner Patterns
Early reports (3) suggest
- Weight & Balance: 2 of 3 applicants report the examiner required a full W&B calculation
- Oral style: 3 of 3 applicants report the examiner used scenario-based questioning throughout
- Navigation tools: 2 of 3 applicants report the examiner accepted EFB use
- Density altitude: 2 of 3 applicants report the examiner did not cover density altitude
- Go/no-go discussion: 3 of 3 applicants report the examiner discussed go/no-go as part of a scenario
- Equipment failure simulated: 1 of 3 applicants report the examiner simulated an electrical failure
- Preflight briefing: 2 of 3 applicants report the examiner gave a full preflight briefing
Based on self-reported pilot submissions. Data methodology
Ratings & Checkride Types
- IFR (Instrument Rating)
- PPL (Private Pilot)
Transparency Disclaimer: This page summarizes patterns reported by applicants. It is not an endorsement, prediction, or guarantee of checkride outcome. Every checkride varies based on the applicant and circumstances.