Patrick Nicholas Arnzen DPE Checkride Gouges
Designated Pilot Examiner
Preparing for an FAA checkride with Designated Pilot Examiner (DPE) Patrick Nicholas Arnzen? GougeHub has 3 first-hand Patrick Nicholas Arnzen checkride gouge reports from pilots who tested. Review oral exam questions, flight test patterns, and examiner insights for CPL and PPL checkrides.
↓ View 3 available gouge reportsPatrick Nicholas Arnzen has three reports on file across private and commercial rides. The picture is consistent: a fair examiner who rewards strong fundamentals. One private applicant called the experience confidence-boosting, with solid prep advice along the way. The examiner does not chase perfection, so focus on flying solid and knowing your aircraft.
On the private oral, expect deep-dive aircraft systems questions. One applicant flagged this as the standout focus, so study your airplane cold. Know how each system works, not just the basics. Trace the fuel, electrical, and other systems through the airplane until you can explain them clearly.
The private flight includes a surprise combination landing back at home base. That detail came up in one report, so plan for it. Practice your short field and soft field landings until they feel natural. Be ready to combine techniques on the way home rather than expecting a single standard pattern.
On the commercial side, the tone stays fair and grounded in fundamentals. One applicant noted the examiner values doing the basics well over a perfect score. The same report described the ride as light on specific questions and maneuvers. So show steady, competent flying and clean execution of the standard tasks.
Two of the three reports mention being light on the specific questions that matter. That means the gouges lean toward style and approach rather than a list of exact items. Use that to set expectations: prepare broadly and know your systems deeply. If you fly with Patrick Nicholas Arnzen next week, study your airplane, sharpen your landings, and trust your fundamentals. Then add your own notes afterward to fill in the specifics for the next pilot in line.
Examiner Patterns
Early reports (3) suggest
- Oral style: 3 of 3 applicants report the examiner kept the oral conversational
- Navigation tools: 2 of 2 applicants report the examiner accepted but did not require paper charts
- When ACS standard not met: 1 of 2 applicants report the examiner noted the deviation and continued
Based on self-reported pilot submissions. Data methodology
Analyzed across 113 site-wide Private Pilot checkrides in the GougeHub database, the same questions keep coming up. Here’s one of the 37 in the guide:
“How do you calculate your takeoff and landing distances for today’s flight?”
⚠ Common Pitfall: Read the chart limitations closely. They often say things like “assumes a paved surface” or “assumes 10° of flaps for takeoff.” Use less flap or a grass strip and the chart may no longer apply.
All 37 questions, ranked by frequency, with Examiner Insights and Common Pitfalls from 113 real checkrides — written and reviewed by Andrew Gray, CFI-II.
Get the Private Pilot Oral Exam Guide — $14 →7-day money-back guarantee · Instant PDF download
Ratings & Checkride Types
- CPL (Commercial Pilot)
- PPL (Private Pilot)
FAA Designee Information
FAA Oversight Office: North Texas FSDO
Status: Active Designee
- Private Pilot Examiner: Airplane Single Engine Land, Airplane Multi-Engine Land
- Commercial & Instrument Rating Examiner: Airplane Single Engine Land, Airplane Multi-Engine Land
- ATPE: Airplane Multi-Engine Land
- Sport Pilot Examiner: Airplane Single Engine Land
- Flight Instructor Examiner: Airplane Single Engine, Airplane Multi-Engine
- Flight Instructor Examiner — Instrument: Airplane Single Engine, Airplane Multi-Engine
- Ground Instructor Examiner
- Flight Instructor Rating Examiner
- Balloon Airman Examiner
- SPFIE
Source: FAA Designee Management System · Verify on FAA.gov →
Other DPEs in Dallas-Fort Worth, TX
Transparency Disclaimer: This page summarizes patterns reported by applicants. It is not an endorsement, prediction, or guarantee of checkride outcome. Every checkride varies based on the applicant and circumstances.